Eng-Tips is the largest engineering community on the Internet
Intelligent Work Forums for Engineering Professionals
RegisterLog in
Congratulations IDS on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!
- Home
- Forums
- People
- Structural Engineers
- Structural engineering general discussion
- Thread starterjoemarch
- Start dateSep 9, 2005
- Status
- Not open for further replies.
- Sep 9, 2005
- #1
joemarch
Structural
- Jul 20, 2004
- 54
Is it a right assumption to model the k-bracing in a frame as tension only members? I've entered a frame into RISA and specified the k-braces to be tension only members. In the results it shows the members taking compression. Should I model the bracing as compression members?
Replies continue below
Recommended for you
Sort by dateSort by votes
- Sep 9, 2005
- #2
UcfSE
Structural
- Dec 27, 2002
- 2,525
Open the RISA help file and search for "tension only sections". That should explain why you are getting some compression in your member even though you specified "tension only". Generally I find RISA's help file to be pretty good.
Upvote0Downvote
- Sep 9, 2005
- #3
mrMikee
Structural
- Apr 23, 2005
- 528
In general I would not model a k-brace with tension only members. Under a full load condition you would end up with a tension force in one brace and a zero force in what would be the compression brace. This puts a large bending moment in the cross member. Of course the members can be sized for this if that's what you want.
The last time I looked (and I don't use RISA now) I think RISA calculated compression forces in tension only members until a buckling value was achieved. As UcfSE says check the manual, there is an explanation for this.
Regards,
-Mike
Upvote0Downvote
- Sep 9, 2005
- #4
DaveAtkins
Structural
- Apr 15, 2002
- 2,868
mrMikee is correct--I have never liked this, but RISA lets tension only members take compression until they buckle.
DaveAtkins
Upvote0Downvote
- Sep 9, 2005
- #5
UcfSE
Structural
- Dec 27, 2002
- 2,525
The information in the help file also provides some information on how to adjust how much compression the "tension only" member can tolerate by adjusting the unbraced length. I don't like designing tension-only braces either. You don't get a good feel for what is going on the the other brace while the tension brace is deforming.
Upvote0Downvote
- Sep 9, 2005
- #6
14159
Structural
- May 31, 2005
- 175
Do not use RISA's tension-only members. I talked this over with them a couple of years ago and it seemed like they didn't even have faith in their implementation. RISA is a great program as long as you're doing basic linear-elastic stuff. Anything advanced or nonlinear is beyond the program's real capabilities.
14159
Upvote0Downvote
- Sep 10, 2005
- #7
aggman
Structural
- Jun 9, 2003
- 253
Version 5.5 of RISA has true tension only members, Euler buckling members, and compression only members. I have used both types and have checked them on small 2-D frames. The results it gives are good as long as you model the structure correctly. I have had problems with this in RISA before version 5.0 came out.
Upvote0Downvote
- Sep 10, 2005
- #8
dbuzz
Structural
- Mar 29, 2003
- 504
I'd model and design them to take the compressive force.
Upvote0Downvote
- Sep 11, 2005
- #9
jec67
Structural
- Oct 22, 2003
- 105
Typically, K-braces are designed as taking both tension and compression forces.
K-braces will also take aprtion of the gravity load from the beam/girder to which they are connected. Consult your steel design manual for additional information on this aspect of the design. I do not have my copy in front of me at this time, but I believe Jack McCormick's steel design book has a treatment on this topic. Perhaps it is Blodgett's weld design book??
Upvote0Downvote
- Oct 10, 2005
- #10
str334
Structural
- Oct 10, 2005
- 1
To elaborate on aggman's post, the true tension only member in RISA-3D takes NO compression, and the Euler member will take compression up to buckling, at which point it fails, so which to use is up to you.
The tension only feature works just fine in RISA-3D, and to my knowledge there is no lack of confidence in it on Risa's part.
There is no reason to hesitate in using them, assuming, as aggman pointed out, you model your structure correctly, but of course that's true for all software.
Upvote0Downvote
- Status
- Not open for further replies.
Similar threads
- Question
CFS Stud Bracing Confusion
- StrEng007
- Nov 8, 2024
- Structural engineering general discussion
- Replies
- 14
- Views
- 3K
Nov 10, 2024
human909
- Locked
- Question
Residential bracing methods1
- AETX
- Sep 12, 2024
- Structural engineering general discussion
- Replies
- 17
- Views
- 439
Sep 14, 2024
lexpatrie
- Question
Lateral Torsional Bracing – Floor Voids
- Eng868
- Oct 25, 2024
- Structural engineering general discussion
- Replies
- 3
- Views
- 574
Oct 25, 2024
Eng868
- Question
Strut K Value for Cantilever
- HBKS
- Nov 2, 2024
- Structural engineering general discussion
- Replies
- 1
- Views
- 2K
Nov 2, 2024
Retrograde
- Question
Tension Only Bracing - Single Angles2
- Everynameistaken
- Oct 19, 2024
- Structural engineering general discussion
- Replies
- 15
- Views
- 4K
Nov 1, 2024
canwesteng
Part and Inventory Search
Sponsor
- Home
- Forums
- People
- Structural Engineers
- Structural engineering general discussion