K-Bracing - Structural engineering general discussion (2025)

Eng-Tips is the largest engineering community on the Internet

Intelligent Work Forums for Engineering Professionals

RegisterLog in

  • Congratulations IDS on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

  • Home
  • Forums
  • People
  • Structural Engineers
  • Structural engineering general discussion
  • Thread starterjoemarch
  • Start dateSep 9, 2005
Status
Not open for further replies.
  • Sep 9, 2005
  • #1

joemarch

Structural
Jul 20, 2004
54

Is it a right assumption to model the k-bracing in a frame as tension only members? I've entered a frame into RISA and specified the k-braces to be tension only members. In the results it shows the members taking compression. Should I model the bracing as compression members?

Replies continue below

Recommended for you

Sort by dateSort by votes

  • Sep 9, 2005
  • #2

UcfSE

Structural
Dec 27, 2002
2,525

Open the RISA help file and search for "tension only sections". That should explain why you are getting some compression in your member even though you specified "tension only". Generally I find RISA's help file to be pretty good.

Upvote0Downvote

  • Sep 9, 2005
  • #3

mrMikee

Structural
Apr 23, 2005
528

In general I would not model a k-brace with tension only members. Under a full load condition you would end up with a tension force in one brace and a zero force in what would be the compression brace. This puts a large bending moment in the cross member. Of course the members can be sized for this if that's what you want.

The last time I looked (and I don't use RISA now) I think RISA calculated compression forces in tension only members until a buckling value was achieved. As UcfSE says check the manual, there is an explanation for this.

Regards,
-Mike

Upvote0Downvote

  • Sep 9, 2005
  • #4

DaveAtkins

Structural
Apr 15, 2002
2,868

mrMikee is correct--I have never liked this, but RISA lets tension only members take compression until they buckle.

DaveAtkins

Upvote0Downvote

  • Sep 9, 2005
  • #5

UcfSE

Structural
Dec 27, 2002
2,525

The information in the help file also provides some information on how to adjust how much compression the "tension only" member can tolerate by adjusting the unbraced length. I don't like designing tension-only braces either. You don't get a good feel for what is going on the the other brace while the tension brace is deforming.

Upvote0Downvote

  • Sep 9, 2005
  • #6

14159

Structural
May 31, 2005
175

Do not use RISA's tension-only members. I talked this over with them a couple of years ago and it seemed like they didn't even have faith in their implementation. RISA is a great program as long as you're doing basic linear-elastic stuff. Anything advanced or nonlinear is beyond the program's real capabilities.

14159

Upvote0Downvote

  • Sep 10, 2005
  • #7

aggman

Structural
Jun 9, 2003
253

Version 5.5 of RISA has true tension only members, Euler buckling members, and compression only members. I have used both types and have checked them on small 2-D frames. The results it gives are good as long as you model the structure correctly. I have had problems with this in RISA before version 5.0 came out.

  • Sep 10, 2005
  • #8

dbuzz

Structural
Mar 29, 2003
504

I'd model and design them to take the compressive force.

Upvote0Downvote

  • Sep 11, 2005
  • #9

jec67

Structural
Oct 22, 2003
105

Typically, K-braces are designed as taking both tension and compression forces.

K-braces will also take aprtion of the gravity load from the beam/girder to which they are connected. Consult your steel design manual for additional information on this aspect of the design. I do not have my copy in front of me at this time, but I believe Jack McCormick's steel design book has a treatment on this topic. Perhaps it is Blodgett's weld design book??

Upvote0Downvote

  • Oct 10, 2005
  • #10

str334

Structural
Oct 10, 2005
1

To elaborate on aggman's post, the true tension only member in RISA-3D takes NO compression, and the Euler member will take compression up to buckling, at which point it fails, so which to use is up to you.

The tension only feature works just fine in RISA-3D, and to my knowledge there is no lack of confidence in it on Risa's part.

There is no reason to hesitate in using them, assuming, as aggman pointed out, you model your structure correctly, but of course that's true for all software.

Upvote0Downvote

Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar threads

  • Question

CFS Stud Bracing Confusion

  • StrEng007
  • Nov 8, 2024
  • Structural engineering general discussion
Replies
14
Views
3K

Nov 10, 2024

human909

  • Locked
  • Question

Residential bracing methods1

  • AETX
  • Sep 12, 2024
  • Structural engineering general discussion
Replies
17
Views
439

Sep 14, 2024

lexpatrie

  • Question

Lateral Torsional Bracing – Floor Voids

  • Eng868
  • Oct 25, 2024
  • Structural engineering general discussion
Replies
3
Views
574

Oct 25, 2024

Eng868

  • Question

Strut K Value for Cantilever

  • HBKS
  • Nov 2, 2024
  • Structural engineering general discussion
Replies
1
Views
2K

Nov 2, 2024

Retrograde

  • Question

Tension Only Bracing - Single Angles2

  • Everynameistaken
  • Oct 19, 2024
  • Structural engineering general discussion
Replies
15
Views
4K

Nov 1, 2024

canwesteng

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor

  • Home
  • Forums
  • People
  • Structural Engineers
  • Structural engineering general discussion
K-Bracing - Structural engineering general discussion (2025)
Top Articles
Latest Posts
Recommended Articles
Article information

Author: Msgr. Benton Quitzon

Last Updated:

Views: 6002

Rating: 4.2 / 5 (43 voted)

Reviews: 90% of readers found this page helpful

Author information

Name: Msgr. Benton Quitzon

Birthday: 2001-08-13

Address: 96487 Kris Cliff, Teresiafurt, WI 95201

Phone: +9418513585781

Job: Senior Designer

Hobby: Calligraphy, Rowing, Vacation, Geocaching, Web surfing, Electronics, Electronics

Introduction: My name is Msgr. Benton Quitzon, I am a comfortable, charming, thankful, happy, adventurous, handsome, precious person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.